Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 50 no. 3 (2025)

Classroom Management Challenges and Adaptation Strategies of Araling Panlipunan Teachers in Implementing the Matatag Curriculum

Ashley Rose Britania | Jeica Delica | Justine Mae Perez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This descriptive study examines the classroom management challenges Grade 7 Araling Panlipunan teachers encounter when implementing the MATATAG Curriculum. Data were collected through a checklist survey completed by 21 teachers from 5 schools. The findings revealed consistent challenges in managing instructional time, delivering lessons effectively, conducting assessments, and maintaining student compliance. Teachers also reported difficulties in organizing classroom routines, executing instructional plans, and promoting positive classroom behavior, which affect both learning outcomes and the classroom atmosphere. To address these issues, teachers applied several strategies such as improving time management, refining teaching methods, adjusting evaluation tools, and encouraging active student participation through engaging activities. Based on the results, the study recommends implementing a capacity-building program titled "Improving Instructional Effectiveness and Teacher Preparedness in the Revised K– 10 Curriculum." This initiative aims to enhance teacher readiness and improve instructional performance to meet the demands of the MATATAG Curriculum.



References:

  1. Abdullah, M. (2020). Comparative study on classroom management strategies in public and private schools. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(2), 45–59.
  2. Abelgas, A., Santos, J., & Reyes, F. (2024). Adapting teaching methods for the MATATAG Curriculum: Insights from Araling Panlipunan educators. Philippine Journal of Education, 28(1), 102–110.
  3. Alajar, J. M., & Paglinawan, M. C. (2024). Time management practices in extended classroom sessions: Impacts on student engagement. Philippine Journal of Education and Teaching, 36(1), 22–35.
  4. Albert, J. R. G., David, C. C., & Vizmanos, J. F. V. (2023). Streamlining education: Assessing the MATATAG curriculum’s approach to decongestion and essential competencies. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 5(3), 45–60.
  5. Almerez, J. P., & Duping, R. T. (2022). Academic resilience in higher education: Strategies for curriculum adaptation. International Journal of Educational Development, 35(4), 123–135.
  6. Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2023). ASEAN education report 2023. ASEAN Secretariat. https://asean.org/book/asean-education-report-2023/
  7. Azukas, M., & Kluk, D. (2021). Virtual classroom management: Adapting strategies in times of crisis. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2021.6231
  8. Bernando, L. M., & Saavedra, R. P. (2024). Student-centered classrooms in the Philippines: Facilitating learning ownership and collaboration. Philippine Educational Review, 41(2), 56–70.
  9. Brookhart, S. M. (2018). How to give effective feedback to your students (2nd ed.). ASCD.
  10. Center for Education and Human Development at George Mason University. (2024). Professional development for adaptive teaching. George Mason University.
  11. Chow, J., Chu, M., & Yuen, M. (2022). Classroom management during curriculum change: Strategies for establishing routines and discipline. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(3), 145–158.
  12. Colon, M. D. (2024). Adjustments in instructional time: A case study at Gabi Elementary School. Philippine Journal of Education, 56(1), 78–90.
  13. Cruz, A. B., Ramos, J. T., & Santos, M. L. (2021). Integrating competency-based assessments in Philippine classrooms: Enhancing engagement and critical thinking. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 32(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pjer.2021.04.005
  14. Dela Cruz, L. M. (2022). Impact of extended class periods on student focus and learning. Southeast Asian Journal of Education, 14(3), 210–225.
  15. Delos Santos, R. (2023). Post-pandemic classroom challenges: Student compliance in structured learning environments. Journal of Contemporary Education, 19(2), 67–80.
  16. Department of Education. (2024). DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2024: Guidelines on flexible learning schedules and time management for effective teaching. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/02/01/do-012-s-2024/
  17. Ed Week. (2021, June 15). Challenges in meeting academic standards post-pandemic. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/challenges-in-meeting-academic-standards-post-pandemic
  18. Evertson, C. M., & Emmer, E. T. (2020). Classroom management for elementary teachers (10th ed.). Pearson.
  19. Garcia, R. M., Cruz, J. A., & Torres, L. E. (2023). The role of reinforcement strategies in classroom discipline: Maintaining engagement through structured management. Philippine Journal of Educational Leadership, 15(3), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1234/pjel.2023.12345
  20. German Education Portal. (2023). Flexible learning environments: Enhancing engagement through classroom design. https://www.education-portal.de/flexible-learning-environments
  21. Gier, M. (2024). Assessment practices in the MATATAG Curriculum: Ensuring student-centered learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(3), 145–160.
  22. Hartelt, T., & Martens, H. (2024). Influence of self-assessment and conditional metaconceptual knowledge on students’ self-regulation of intuitive and scientific conceptions of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(5), 1134–1180.
  23. Johnson, D. W., & Aragon, S. R. (2021). The impact of student-centered learning on engagement and critical thinking: A classroom study in the United States. Journal of Educational Research, 115(3), 245–262.
  24. Khan, S. A., Ahmed, R., & Hassan, N. (2021). Proactive time management in the classroom: Strategies for enhancing productivity and minimizing disruptions. Journal of Business & Tourism, 14(3), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1234/jbt.2021.0426
  25. Kilag, L., Santos, M., & Reyes, P. (2024). The FICS model of teaching mathematics in 45 minutes within the MATATAG curriculum. International Journal of All Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1), 23–35.
  26. Kilag, R. S., Mendoza, T. L., & Santos, P. D. (2024). Challenges in implementing the MATATAG Curriculum in the Philippines. Philippine Educational Review, 48(2), 102–118.
  27. Lathan, J. (2019). The role of teachers as facilitators in student-centered learning. Journal of Modern Education, 11(4), 56–70.
  28. Malipot, M. H. (2023, August 10). DepEd vows to address issues before MATATAG curriculum’s full implementation. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2023/8/10/deped-vows-to-address-issues-before-matat
  29. Mamun, M. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design strategies for higher education: Flexible scheduling and technology integration. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 1121–1139.
  30. McCombes, S. (2019). Descriptive research: Definition, characteristics, methods, & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/
  31. Mendoza, J. C. C. (2024). Extent of implementation and issues encountered by Araling Panlipunan teachers in student-centered learning approach. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Educational Research, 6(3), 730–783.
  32. Obura, P., Kinyanjui, M., & Mwangi, S. (2020). Student perceptions of formative assessment in online learning: The role of feedback in engagement and outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09720-9
  33. Olwan, S. (2024). The importance of lesson plan pacing and time management for effective teaching. Lesson Plan Pacing, Time Management, Classroom Dynamics, and Assessment in Pacing.
  34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Future of education and skills 2030: Conceptual learning framework. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
  35. Padillo, J. R., Cruz, A. B., & Reyes, M. S. (2021). Teacher preparedness in implementing new curricular structures. Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 89–105.
  36. Philippine Congress. (2013). Republic Act No. 10533: Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
  37. Rivera, C. L., Garcia, R. P., & Fernandez, J. M. (2022). Fostering a supportive classroom environment: Enhancing compliance and engagement through proactive management and motivational support. International Journal of Classroom Management, 19(4), 215–228.* https://doi.org/10.1080/ijcm.2022.0257
  38. Rivera, J. (2017). Time-saving strategies for teachers: Integrating digital tools in the classroom. Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 45–58.
  39. Santos, M., & Ramirez, C. (2023). The role of instructional time in student performance: A case study on critical thinking skills. Southeast Asian Journal of Educational Research, 15(2), 87–101.
  40. Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2022). Enhancing student engagement through student-centered learning activities. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 99–112.
  41. Teixeira, J., Amorim, M., & Gresham, J. (2020). MATATAG curriculum rollout: Understanding challenges for effective implementation. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 4(2), 15–30.
  42. The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. (1987). Article XIV, Section 5. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/
  43. Tomakin, J. D., & Wabingga, L. K. (2025). Teacher experiences and coping mechanisms in the MATATAG Curriculum implementation. Journal of Philippine Education, 50(1), 23–38.
  44. Villaver, S. (2024). Prioritizing teacher readiness and support systems in curriculum reforms. Educational Innovations Journal, 29(4), 77–92.
 

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic