HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 50 no. 7 (2025)

The Perceptions of Millennial English Teachers in the Use of Slangs by the Gen-Zs as a Lexis Phenomenon

Pierre John Leal | Melona Michelle Ubas | Stella Mariz Bejarasco | Anthony Vincent Bonpua | Ian Jarabelo

Discipline: others in psychology

 

Abstract:

The English language evolves due to various trends and technological advancements. As societies age, a new generation appears, and neologisms are bound to occur. This study highlights two generations: Generation Z (Gen Z) and the Millennials. This research aims to identify and compare that aimed to investigate the lexis phenomenon behind Gen-Z slang from the perceptions of five (5) Millennial English teachers who are or were employed as senior high school teachers within the grounds of the University of San Jose-Recoletos (USJ-R), and to discuss the issue of the generational communication gap. A phenomenological qualitative method, using one-on-one interviews and a questionnaire, was employed in four parts to gather data on knowledge and perceptions of Gen-Z slang use. Upon the analysis and the comparison of the various answers of the participants, results show that while Millennials view the evolution of the English language positively, the issue of the generational gap persists, depending on the knowledge of both the meaning and usage of Gen-Z slang by Gen-Zs during informal or casual conversations, both in class and on social media. Despite the challenges posed by the generational gap, this study indicates that Millennials can adapt to and appreciate the use of Gen-Z slang to bridge the gap between Millennials and Gen-Zs. This study validates the importance of highlighting the generational gap and how it threatens communication, especially when two generations collide and technological advancement advances. Furthermore, future studies can expand the number of participants and gather insights beyond Gen-Z and Millennials.



References:

  1. Beaman, K. V. (2024). Language Change in Real- and Apparent-Time: Coherence in the Individual and the Community (1st ed.). Routledge, 1–305, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267331
  2. Brown,  Z. C., Anicich, E. M., Galinsky, A. D. (2020). Compensatory conspicuous communication:  Low status increases jargon use. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161(0), 274–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.001  
  3. Byrne, Michelle M. (2001). “Understanding life experiences through a phenomenological approach to research: The Official Voice of Perioperative Nursing.” AORN Journal, 73(4), 830–832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)61812-7
  4. Carrington, L. (2024). Slang: A Lifestyle Trend Communication Accommodation Amongst Small Business Owners, Regent University, ProQuest, 1-24, www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/slang-lifestyle-trend-communication-accommodation/docview/3051261091/se-2
  5. Dembe, T. (2024). The Impact of Social Media on Language Evolution. European Journal of Linguistics, University of Rwanda. 3(3), 1–14, http://doi.org/10.47941/ejl.2049   
  6. Dhawan, E. (2021). Digital Body Language: How to Build Trust and Connection, No Matter the Distance. St. Martin’s Press.
  7. Dimock, M. (2019, January 17). Defining generations: Where Millennials end, and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/ 
  8. Ekayati et al. (2024). Digital Dialects: The Impact of Social Media on Language Evolution And Emerging Forms of Communication. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 3(2), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v3i2.986 
  9. Gao, M. H. (2023). From the Traditionalists to Gen Z: Conceptualizing Intergenerational Communication and Media Preferences in the USA. Online Media and Global Communication, 2(3), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2023-0011 
  10. Grandez, M. et al. (2023). Forda Ferson: The Morphological Structure of Generation Z Slang in Social Media. Journal of English As A Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3(2), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.31098/jefltr.v3i2.1847
  11. Hu, J. & Cheung, C. (2024). Social Identity and Social Integration: A Meta-analysis Exploring the Relationship Between Social Identity and Social Integration. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, 1–13,  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1361163   
  12. Ibrahim, A., Edan, M., & Alnoori, B. (2024). Neologism in Selected Social Media Platforms: A Cross-Cultural Study, Al-Iraqia University, Iraq, ResearchGate, 1-10, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386500857_Neologism_in_Selected_Social_Media_Platforms_A_Cross-Cultural_Study
  13. Jayanti, A. D., Rochiyati, E. S., Subaharianto, A., Setyari, A. D., Suyanto, B., & Sariono, A. (2024). SLANG LEXICON BY GENERATION Z IN THE UNIVERSITY OF JEMBER, International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education, 10(4), 1797-1804, https://doi:/16.0415/IJARIIE-24680
  14. Jebaselvi, C., Mohanraj, K., Thangamani, A., & Kumar, M. (2023). The Impact of Social Media on the Evolution of Language and Communication Trends. Shanlax International Journal of English, 12(1), 41-44, https://doi:10.34293/english.v12i1.6725
  15. Jeresano, M., & Carretero, M. (2022). Digital culture and social media slang of Gen Z. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 3(2), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1314/RG.2.2.36361.93285
  16. Juli, A., Suci, M., S., & Esti, A., (2024). The Discourse of Gen Z in Social Media Network: Inputs to English Language Teaching. Semantik: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Budaya, 2(3), 206–215, https://doi.org/10.61132/semantik.v2i3.792
  17. Krycha, W. (2024). “Born to Slay”: A study of Generation Z’s internet slang in Polish and English online communities (Master’s thesis). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26268.30081
  18. Moremen, C., Hoogsteden, J., & Birrell, E. (2024). Generational differences in understandings of privacy terminology. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2024(3), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.56553/popets-2024-0094
  19. Rahma, N. & Moetia, M. (2024). An Analysis of Using Slang Words in Social Media X. Journal Syntax Idea, 6(8), 3563–3570, https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i8.4307
  20. Rudolph, Cort, et al. (2020). Answers to 10 Questions About ‘Generations’ and ‘Generational Differences’ in the Workplace. Ten Questions About Generations, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7w9kv.
  21. Saputra,  L.,  &  Marlina,  L. (2019). An analysis of slang words used by Instagram account  Plesbol. English  Language  and Literature, 8(3), 329–339,  https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v8i3.105802  
  22. Sipocz, D., Freeman, J., & Elton, J. (2021).“A Toxic Trend?”: Generational Conflict and Connectivity in Twitter Discourse Under the #BoomerRemover Hashtag, The Gerontologist, 61(2), 166–175, https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa177 
  23. Soriano, C. A. (2023). Forda Analysisivity Ang Ferzon: A Social Scientific Inquiry on the Rise of Gen-Z Lexicons Through Social Media and How it Created A Newfangled Culture, Mindanao State University, 1-14, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15006.00329  
  24. Sydnor, W. (2023). Concerning the Different Pronunciations of “our,” How Does the Pronunciation Affect People of Generational and Foreign Language Background Differences? Journal of Student Research, 12(1), 1-8, https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i1.4007.
  25. Vacalares, S., Salas, A., Babac, B., Cagalawan, A., & Calimpong, C. (2023). The intelligibility of internet slangs between millennials and Gen Zers: A comparative study. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 9(1), 400–409,  https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2023.9.1.0456
  26. Yang, Y. (2024). Research on the Impact of Internet Language on Communication. Communications in Humanities Research, 46(2298), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/46/20242298
  27. Zarna, K. (2024, April). The Internet. ResearchGate. 237–253, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379697949_The_Internet.
  28. Zohail, A. (2023). The Discourse of Gen Z in Social Media Network: Inputs to English Language Teaching. The Research Probe, 3(2), 1–176. https://doi.org/10.53378/trp.12232