Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 26 no. 9 (2024)

Determinants of Online Harassment and Its Effects on Learners’ Self-Esteem and Academic Performance: Toward Improved School Child Protection Policies

Ricky Montano | Joseph Alegre

Discipline: others in psychology

 

Abstract:

This study explores the determinants of online harassment and its effects on learners’ self-esteem and academic performance, aiming to improve school-based child protection policies. The research addresses the growing exposure of students to online platforms and the corresponding rise in cyberstalking, online impersonation, and catfishing. Utilizing a mixed-method approach, the study draws from a sample of 50 respondents, examining their experiences across these online harassment forms and the impact on their self-esteem—measured through cognitive, learning, and metacognitive engagement—and academic outcomes. Key findings indicate a strong correlation between online impersonation and negative impacts on self-esteem and academic performance, with cyberstalking and catfishing also showing significant associations, particularly in learning and metacognitive engagement. Students affected by these forms of online harassment reported diminished self-confidence and concentration, leading to poorer academic outcomes. Data suggests that male students and those aged 9-12 face higher exposure to online risks, highlighting the need for targeted interventions. This research underscores the importance of reinforcing digital literacy and online safety education within the school curriculum. The findings suggest that enhanced child protection policies must address the complexities of online harassment, fostering safer online environments for learners. The study concludes with recommendations for a comprehensive school-based Child Protection Policy Program that includes preventative measures and support systems for students encountering online harassment.



References:

  1. 7 types of online harassment to watch out for [infographic]. Digital Information World. Retrieved February 23, 2022, from https://www.digitalinformationworld.com/2019/03/infographic-how-to-handle-online-harassment.html
  2. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A.,  Kamin, Y. B., & Moafa, F. A. (2018). A model of factors affecting cyberbullying behaviors among university students. IEEE Access, 7, 2978-2985.
  3. Baccarella, Timm F. Wagner, Jan H. Kietzmann, Ian P. McCarthy Social media? It's serious! Understanding the dark side of social media, European Management Journal, Volume 36, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 431-438 ,ISSN 0263-2373, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.07.002.
  4. Bhatta, M. P., Shakya, S., & Jefferis, E. (2014). Association of being bullied in school with suicide ideation and planning among rural middle school adolescents. Journal of School Health, 84(11), 731-738
  5. Desk, W., & Web DeskMaking Digital Information Accessible To The World. Send your news story via this form: https://www.digitalinformationworld.com/p/contact-us.html. (2019, March 3).
  6. Fanti, K. A., Demetriou, A. G., & Hawa, V. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 168-181.
  7. Fox, J., & Moreland, J. J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.083
  8. Habiba. (1970, January 1). الجرائم الإليكترونية. Retrieved February 23, 2022, from http://eljaraimeliliktouniya.blogspot.com/
  9. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206-221
  10. Juvonen, J., Graham, S., & Schuster, M.A. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112, 1231-1237
  11. Kubiszewski, V., Fontaine, R., Potard, C., & Auzoult, L. (2015). Does cyberbullying overlap with school bullying when taking modality of involvement into account? Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 49-57
  12. Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., & Olson, B. F. (2010). To control or not to control? Parenting behaviors and adolescent online aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1651-1656.
  13. Lohbeck, A., & Petermann, F. (2018). Cyber victimization, self-esteem, and social relationships among German secondary school students. Journal of school violence, 17(4), 472-486.
  14. Maple, C., Short, E., Brown, A., Bryden, C., & Salter, M. (2012). Cyberstalking in the UK: Analysis and Recommendations. International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST), 3(4), 34-51.
  15. Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., & Ricketts, M. L. (2014).  Juveniles and cyber stalking in the United States: An analysis of theoretical predictors of patterns of online perpetration. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 8(1), 47-56.
  16. Nobles, M. R., Reyns, B. W., Fox, K. A., & Fisher, B. S. (2014). Protection against pursuit: A conceptual and empirical comparison of cyberstalking and stalking victimization among a national sample. Justice Quarterly, 31(6), 986-1014.
  17. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2012). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health, 82(9), 454-460.
  18. Paullet, K. L., Rota, D. R., & Swan, T. T. (2009). Cyberstalking: An exploratory study of students at a mid-Atlantic university. Issues in Information Systems, 10(2), 640-649.
  19. Price, M., Chin, M. A., Higa-McMillan, C., Kim, S., & Frueh, B. C. (2013). Prevalence and internalizing problems of ethnoracially diverse victims of traditional and cyberbullying. School Mental Health, 5, 183-191. doi:10.1007/s12310-013-9104-6
  20. Reyns BW, Fisher BS, Randa R. Explaining Cyberstalking Victimization Against College Women Using a multi-theoretical Approach: Self-Control, Opportunity, and Control Balance. Crime & Delinquency. 2018;64(13):1742-1764. doi:10.1177/0011128717753116
  21. Strawhun, J., Adams, N., & Huss, M. T. (2013). The assessment of cyberstalking: An expanded examination includes social networking, attachment, jealousy, and anger in relation to violence and abuse. Violence and Victims, 28(4), 715-730.
  22. UNICEF. (n.d.). Online bullying remains prevalent in the Philippines, And other countries. UNICEF. Retrieved February 23, 2022, from https://www.unicef.org/philippines/press-releases/online-bullying-remains-prevalent-philippines-other-countries
  23. Varjas, K., Mahan, D., & Meyers, J. (2013). Middle school students’ perceptions of and responses to cyberbullying prevention strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 50(7), 658-677.
  24. Welsh, A., & Lavoie, J. (2012). Risky business: An examination of risk-taking. online inclusiveness, and cyberstalking victimization. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 6(1), article 1.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic