Letter Blocks Intervention: A Holistic Approach in Addressing Spelling Difficulties in Elementary School
Wyeth Alagenio | Abegail Shane Abes | Mary Ann Gultiano | Mary Rose Sanchez | Deveyvon L Espinosa | Jonelson C. Escandallo | Conie Cerna | Kristy Jane R Muegna | Regine Generalao
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to identify effective strategies and intervention tailored to address the spelling difficulties faced by particular group of learners. This study is quantitative research utilizing correlational research design to determine the relationship exist between spelling difficulties among the learners and the letter blocks intervention to the development of the learners (Grade4); to assess their progress in spelling difficulties (based on their scores on the Pre-test assessment. Moreover, with an overall mean score of 71.80 that demonstrate the effectiveness of the intervention in enhancing learners’ spelling sills; interactive and engaging methods, such as using letter tiles and other manipulatives object, significantly enhance students' spelling abilities by providing concrete experiences that support phonemic awareness and orthographic knowledge. This hands-on approach allows students to physically manipulate letters and sounds, reinforcing their learning through multi-sensory engagement. Educators might consider devoting additional attention to improve spelling difficulties among the learners through various interventions especially learners in primary level. The pre-test results revealed that the students' spelling abilities were below the expected level, indicating low proficiency. However, the post-test scores showed a marked improvement, with the students' scores rising after the letter blocks intervention was introduced. This suggests that the letter blocks intervention effectively enhances spelling abilities among Grade 4 learners.
References:
- Apel K. (2021). The Relation between a Systematic Analysis of Spelling and Orthographic and Phonological Awareness Skills in First-Grade Children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-20-00114 (Apel K., 2021)
- Blachowicz, C.L.Z., & Fisher, P.J. (2020). Teaching Vocabulary in All Classrooms. Pearson.
- Craik, F.I.M., & Tulving, E. (2021). Levels of Processing and Retention of Words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 112(4), 567-580.
- Divani (2018). Exploring The Challenges Faced By Teachers In Teaching Writing Skills And How Anchor Charts Can Address Them. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dd03/10da8605dcb7da27d2c0e7c5045908c90af7.pdf (Divani, 2018)
- Ehri (2017).Orthographic_mapping_and_literacy_development_revisited. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318739413 (Ehri, 2017)
- Hadaway (2018). Data Gathering. Most common-observation Research methods. Retrieved from https://fuelcycle.com/blog/the-3-most (Hadaway, 2018)
- Hotjar, D. (2018). The ultimate guide to guantitative data analysis. Retrieved from https://www.hotjar.com/quantitaive-data-analysis/: (Hotjar, D., 2018)
- Kusuma, I., Adnyani, N. L. D. S., & Taharyanti, G. A. P. (2017). Developing 10 Interesting Games as the breakthrough of Monotonous Implementation of Flashcards to Vocabulary Learning and Assessments. Script Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 2(1), 68-82.
- Stahl, S.A., & Nagy, W.E. (2020). Teaching Word Meanings. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Wolter J. (2006). Effects of phonotactic and orthotactic probabilities during fast mapping on 5-year-olds' learning to spell. Developmental Neuropsychology. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2901_3 (Wolter J., 2006)