Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 50 no. 6 (2025)

A Path Analysis of Factors Shaping Scientific Attitudes: Inquiry-Based Learning Environment, Metacognitive Awareness, and Critical Thinking in Science Education

Gizzelle Ligutom | Jose Marie Ocdenaria

Discipline: others in psychology

 

Abstract:

This study investigates the direct and indirect effects of inquiry-based learning environment, metacognitive awareness, and critical thinking on the scientific attitudes of first-year college students enrolled in three colleges of Davao de Oro. Using a descriptive correlational design with path analysis, the study examined the interconnectedness of these variables. The results indicate that an inquiry-based learning environment, metacognitive awareness, and critical thinking significantly predict students’ scientific attitudes. Notably, the best-fit model shows that metacognitive awareness exerts a substantial influence on inquiry-based learning environment, metacognitive awareness, and critical thinking, emphasizing its foundational role in shaping these factors. While metacognitive awareness and an inquirybased learning environment have a modest effect on scientific attitudes, critical thinking has a comparatively greater impact. Overall, the model effectively captures the relationships among these variables, reflecting a coherent, wellfitting structure. These findings imply that cultivating metacognitive awareness, promoting an inquiry-based learning environment, and strengthening critical thinking can synergistically e



References:

  1. Abdelrahman, R. M., (2020). Metacognitive Awareness and Academic Motivation and Their Impact on Academic Achievement of Ajman University Students. Heliyon, 6(9), 41-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04192
  2. Acarli, D. S., & Dervisoglu, S., (2021). Effect of Inquiry-Based Biology Laboratory Applications on Scientific Process Skills, Attitude, Self-Efficacy and Self-Confidence. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practices, 15-29. https://doi.org/10.52634/MIER/2021/V11/I1/1751
  3. Adarlo, G., De Leon, M., & Favis, A. M., (2022). Exploring Students’ Attitudes Toward Science and Course Engagement as Predictors of Science Literacy. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 20(4), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.54808/JSCI.20.04.8
  4. Aggarwal, R., & Ranganathan, P., (2019). Study Designs: Descriptive Studies. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 10(1), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18
  5. Agustina, L., Sari, D. P., & Yuliani, H., (2024). Students’ Creative Thinking Ability on Problems of Mathematics Literacy. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i1.6760
  6. Akcaoglu, M. O., Eskici, M., & Gokbulut, B., (2023). The Mediating Role of Metacognitive Awareness in The Relationship Between Critical Thinking and Self-Regulation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101187
  7. Akmam, A., Afrizon, R., Koto, I., Setiawan, D., Hidayat, R., & Novitra, F., (2024). Integration of Cognitive Conflict in Generative Learning Model to Enhancing Students’ Creative Thinking Skills. Eurasia Journal Of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2504-em2504. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15026
  8. Akpur, U. (2024). Metacognitive Awareness and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.1433740
  9. AlAli, R., & Al-Barakat, A. (2024). Young Children’s Attitudes Toward Science Learning in Early Learning Grades. Emerald Insight. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/2046-3162.htm
  10. Alawiah, T., Maksum, A., & Madani, F., (2024). Inquiry-Based Learning Improving Critical Thinking Ability In View Of Elementary School Students’ Learning Motivation. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 7(3), 2985-2999. https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v7i3.9750
  11. Al-Balushi, S. M., Al-Harthy, I. S., Almehrizi, R. S., Ambusiaidi, A. K., Al-Saadi, K. K., Al-Aghbari, M. S., Al-Balushi, M., & Al-Balushi, K. A., (2022). Metacognitive Awareness Perceptions Of Students With High And Low Scores On TIMSS-Like Science Tests. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 10(3), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2022-10-3-73-82
  12. Al-Hanifah, J. A., Cholily, Y. M., & Ummah, S. K., (2023). Analysis Of Students’ Analytical Thinking Ability And Mathematical Communication Using Online Group Investigation Learning Model. Mathematics Education Journal, 7(1), 100-113. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v7i1.23342
  13. Alimbaev, M. (2023). Student Autonomy and Self-Directed Learning in English Classrooms. Renaissance in the Paradigm of Educational and Technological Innovations in the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.47689/xxia-ttipr-vol1-iss1-pp320-323
  14. Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: Literature Review. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 21–30.Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1239945.pdf
  15. Alsharif, H., & Symons, J. (2020). Open-Mindedness as a Corrective Virtue. Philosophy, 96(1), 73-97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819120000352
  16. Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216
  17. Arifianti, D., & Baidawi, M. (2024). Improving Students’ Creative Thinking Skills in Mathematics Through Solving Open-Ended Problems. Jurnal Multidisiplin Ibrahimy, 2(1), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.35316/jummy.v2i1.5551
  18. Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., Pathoni, H., Kurniawan, W., Jufrida, J., Dwi Agus Kurniawan, & R. Perdan., (2019). Motivation and Attitude of Students on Physics Subject in The Middle School in Indonesia. International Education Studies, 12(9), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n9p15
  19. Azevedo, R. (2019). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in K-12 Schools. In R. J.ternberg & R.
  20. Babaylo, P. M. A. (2023). Science-Related Attitudes and Academic Achievements of Students with Varied Learning Styles. Journal of Science and Technology Education, 3(1). https://nosteonline.org/science-related-attitudes-and-academic-achievements-of-students-with-varied-learning-styles/
  21. Bellaera, L., Weinstein-Jones, Y., Ilie, S., & Baker, S. T., (2021). Critical Thinking in Practice: The Priorities And Practices of Instructors Teaching in Higher Education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100856
  22. Berkson, G., & Gijbels, D. (2020). Translating Knowledge into Practice: An Overview. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(3), 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2019-0035
  23. Bernardo, A. B. I., Salanga, M. G. C., & Aguas, K. M. C., (2008). Filipino Adolescent Students’ Conceptions Of Learning Goals. What the West can learn from the East: Asian perspectives on the psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 169–190). Information Age Publishing.
  24. Bhandari, P. (2021). Ethical Considerations In Research: Types & Examples. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com
  25. Bineth, A. (2021). Towards A Sociology Of Curiosity: Theoretical And Empirical Consideration Of The Epistemic Drive Notion. Theory and Society, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11186-021-09464-Y
  26. Bitzenbauer, P. (2021). Development of a Test Instrument to Investigate Secondary School Students’ Declarative Knowledge of Quantum Optics. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.30935/SCIMATH/10946
  27. Błaszczak, A. (2022). Actively Open-Minded Thinking: Introduction and an Attempt to Describe the Idea Behind. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, 35(3), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.17951/j.2022.35.3.23-41
  28. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R., (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company.
  29. Boukayoua, Z., Kaddari, F., & Bennis, N., (2021). Students’ Interest in Science Learning and Measurement Practices: Questions for Research in The Moroccan School Context. SHS Web of Conferences, 119, 05006. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111905006
  30. Braithwaite, D. W., & Sprague, L. (2021). Conceptual Knowledge, Procedural Knowledge, and Metacognition in Routine and Nonroutine Problem Solving. Cognitive Science, 45(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/COGS.13048
  31. Butvilas, T., Zilinskiene, D., Bubnys, R., Colomer, J., Cañabate, D., & Masoodi, M., (2023). Metacognitive Awareness, Knowledge and Regulation of Cognition Factors Among Lithuanian University Students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-02-2023-0069 
  32. Cacciattolo, M. (2015). Ethical Considerations in Research. In The Praxis of English Language Teaching and Learning. 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-112-0_4
  33. Cakıcı, D. (2018). Metacognitive awareness and critical thinking abilities of pre-service EFL teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(5), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n5p116
  34. Capiral, C. I. S. (2022). Scientific Attitude Inventory of Junior High School Students During Pandemic. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(11). https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.11.03
  35. Casa-Coila, M. D., Mamani-Vilca, P. S., Pari-Achata, D., Pacori-Zapana, E., Perez-Argollo, K., & Paredes-Aliaga, J. S., (2024). Inquiry-Based Learning and Collaborative Work in Undergraduate Students. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(3), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i3.3440
  36. Cekule, L., & Cekuls, A. (2022). Understanding the Potential of Information in Decision Making. Proceedings of the 19th International Scientific Conference.  https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2022/s08.090
  37. Chali, M. T., Eshete, S. K., & Debela, K. L.., (2022). Learning How Research Design Methods Work: A Review of Creswell’s Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. The Qualitative Report, 27(12), 2956-2960. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5901
  38. Chan, J. W. W., & Pow, J. W. C. (2020). The Role of Social Annotation in Facilitating Collaborative Inquiry-Based Learning. Computers & Education, 147.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103787
  39. Charles, E. S., Lenton, K., Adams, R., Dugdale, M., Hughes, S., Laroche, K., Cormier, C., Turcotte, V., & Zhang, C., (2022). Successfully Implementing Inquiry-Based Labs: A Case Study for a College Waves and Modern Physics Course. Proceedings of SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2632373
  40. Chaudhari, R., & Deshpande, K. (2023). ML Based Comprehensive Application to Enhance Soft Skills. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETET-SIP58143.2023.10151569
  41. Chen, C. (2022). Curiosity. International Surgery, 195-195. https://doi.org/10.9738/0020-8868-99.3.195
  42. Chen, R. H. (2021). Fostering Students’ Workplace Communicative Competence and Collaborative Mindset through an Inquiry-Based Learning Design. Education Sciences, 11(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010017
  43. Chepkirui, J., & Huang, W. (2021). A Path Analysis Model Examining Self-Concept and Motivation Pertinent to Undergraduate Academic Performance: A Case of Kenyan Public Universities. Educational Research and Reviews, 16(3), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2021.4123
  44. Chheun, S., & Kong, S. O. (2023). Implementing Scientific Method to Strengthen the Student’s Scientific Attitude: A Study on Biology Subject. INSECTA. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v4i2.7563
  45. Chong, S., & Lu, T. (2019). Early Childhood Teachers’ Perception of the Professional Self And in Relation to the Early Childhood Communities. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(7), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2019v44n7.5
  46. Chumdari, C., Widianto Atmojo, I. R., Ardiansyah, R., & Shintawati, A., (2023). The Effect of Metacognitive Awareness on the Critical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Prospective Teachers. AL-ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 4527. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.4527
  47. Constantine, E. A., & Lay, Y. F. (2013). Attitudes towards Science and Metacognitive Awareness: Impact on Students’ Science Achievement. 5th International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education, SEAMEO RECSAM, Penang,Malaysia.Retrievedfrom https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311948550_Attitudes_towards_Science_and_Metacognitive_Awareness_Impact_on_Students'_Science_Achievement 
  48. Crossman, J. (2023). Superstitions and Rationality. In Palgrave Studies in Workplace Spirituality and Fulfillment (pp. 103-123). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59020-7_6
  49. Curtain, S. (2022). How Can I Reimagine My Practice So That I Teach ‘Big Ideas’ Rather Than Subject-Specific Content?. In Innovative Teaching in Higher Education, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5099-7_4
  50. Corredor, B. Y. A., González, R., Montenegro, C. E., & Sánchez, C. A.  (2023). Didactics to Enhance Observation, in Educational Contexts.  114-121. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-44131-8_12
  51. DeCaro, M. S., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2019). Examining the Roles of Prior Knowledge And Conceptual Understanding in The Effects of Self-Explanation on Procedural Knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 113, 101-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101224
  52. Dignath, C., van Ewijk, R., Perels, F., & Fabriz, S., (2023). Let Learners Monitor the Learning Content and Their Learning Behavior! A Meta-analysis on the Effectiveness of Tools to Foster Monitoring. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2) doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09718-4
  53. Di Vincenzo, F., Mascia, D., Bjork, J., & Magnusson, M., (2021). Attention to Ideas! Exploring Idea Survival in Internal Crowdsourcing. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2019-0073
  54. Divrik, R., Pilten, P., & Tas, A. M., (2020). Effect of Inquiry-Based Learning Method Supported by Metacognitive Strategies on Fourth-Grade Students’ Problem-Solving and Problem-Posing Skills: A Mixed Methods Research. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.191
  55. Duran, M., & Dokme, I., (2016). The Effect of Inquiry-Based Learning Approach on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 2887–2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a
  56. Durukan, N., Kızkapan, O., & Bektaş, O., (2022). Metacognition Enhancing Strategies in Science Classrooms: Science Teachers’ Practices. Inquiry in Education, 14(1), Article 5. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/ie/vol14/iss1/5
  57. Edwards, A. A., Steacy, L. M., Siegelman, N., Rigobon, V. M., Kearns, D. M., Rueckl, J. G., & Compton, D. L., (2022). Unpacking the Unique Relationship Between Set for Variability and Word Reading Development: Examining Word- And Child-Level Predictors of Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1242-1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000696
  58. Esteban, A. M. Jr., Darmuki, A., & Esteban, A., (2023). The Effect of Collaboration Inquiry Problem Based Learning Model on 4C Skills. Kredo: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra. https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v7i1.9838
  59. Eymur, G., & Geban, O. (2011). An Investigation of the Relationship between Motivation and Academic Achievement of Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(161).Retrievedfrom https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270896533_An_Investigation_of_the_Relationship_between_Motivation_and_Academic_Achievement_of_Pre-service_Chemistry_Teachers
  60. Fahmidani, Y., & Rohaeti, E. (2020). Attitude Toward Chemistry: Student’s Perception Based on Learning Experience. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012016
  61. Fathayati, S., Isnaeni, W., & Marianti, A., (2021). Scientific Attitude Assessment Instruments Using Self-Assessment in Project-Based Learning Development. Journal of Innovative Science Education.doi: 10.15294/jise.v10i1.49985
  62. Fatkhriyah, R. Y. (2019). Inquiry-Based Learning: An Attempt to Enhance Students’ Speaking Performance. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(7), 912-922. https://doi.org/10.17977/JPTPP.V4I7.12633
  63. Fatonah, S., Prasetyo, Z. K., Utami, A. D., Chasanah, U., Lusiana, L., & Siregar, V. V.,  (2024). Scientific Attitude and Its Effect on Students’ Productivity. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i4.47727
  64. Fisher, M. (2023). Exploring Factors Affecting Scientific Attitude in Secondary School Students: A Comprehensive Analysis. Research Highlights in Language and Linguistics Education, 38-53. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/rhlle/v7/5712a
  65. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive–developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  66. Francisco, F., & Gonçalves-Sá, J. (2019). A Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing: Excess Confidence Explains Negative Attitudes towards Science. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3360734
  67. Fregonese, F. (2018). Community Involvement in Biomedical Research Conducted in The Global Health Context: What can be done to make it really matter?. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0283-4
  68. Gangrade, R. M. J. (2024). The Influence of Scientific Attitude on Academic Achievement among Secondary School Students. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.20725
  69. Garcia-Carmona, A. (2023). Scientific Thinking and Critical Thinking in Science Education: Two Distinct but Symbiotically Related Intellectual Processes. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00460-5
  70. Garzon, J. R. (2023). Metacognitive Inquiry Via Reflective Tasking Methodology. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(1), Article 1136. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7011136
  71. Gaunkar, N. P., & Mina, M. (2020). A Perspective on Students’ Autonomy in Learning and Engaging in an Inquiry-Based Learning Environment. Paper presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34032
  72. Gkagkas, V., & Hatzikraniotis, E. (2024). Exploring the Development of Questioning Inquiry Skill in Secondary School Students Via Physics Inquiry-Based Learning Experiments. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on New Perspectives in Science Education, Florence, Italy. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.38179.76595
  73. Gladovic, C., McDonald, B., & McDonald, J., (2023). How Can Learners Practice Evaluative Judgement Using Qualitative Self-Assessment?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2291341
  74. Gordon, B. G. (2020). Vulnerability in Research: Basic Ethical Concepts and General Approach to Review. Ochsner Journal, 20(34–38). https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0079
  75. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N., (2009). Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216
  76. Goupil, L., & Proust, J. (2022). Curiosity as a Metacognitive Feeling. Social Science Research Network, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4141925
  77. Grant, S. C. (2021). Informed Consent—We Can and Should Do Better. JAMA Network Open, 4(4), e2110848. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10848
  78. Guerrero, J. S., & Bautista, R. G. (2023). Inquiry-Based Teaching in Secondary Science. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(2), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.58885/ijssh.v08i2.146.jg
  79. Gutierrez de Blume, A. P., Wang, Y., Du, H., & Montoya Londoño, D. M., (2024). An Investigation of Subjective Metacognitive Awareness and Objective Absolute Monitoring Accuracy among Undergraduate Students from China, Colombia, Spain, And The U.S.: The Role Of Culture. Revista CES Psicología. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.7303
  80. Halini, H., Zubaidah, R., Pasaribu, R. L., Mirza, A., & Afriansyah, E. A., (2023). Students’ Scientific Attitudes and Creative Thinking Skills. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 315-326. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i2.2326
  81. Hankin, D. G., Mohr, M. S., & Newman, K. B., (2019). Stratified Sampling in Ecological and Natural Resource Sciences. in Sampling Theory: For the Ecological and Natural Resource Sciences, 68-91. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198815792.003.0005
  82. Hannan, C. E., (2019). Very Superstitious: The Relationship between Desperation and Superstitious Behavior. Murray State Theses and Dissertations, 145. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/etd/145
  83. Hartelt, T., & Martens, H., (2024). Self-Regulatory and Metacognitive Instruction regarding Student Conceptions: Influence on Students’ Self-Efficacy And Cognitive Load. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450947
  84. Hassan, S., Venkateswaran, S. P., Agarwal, P., Sulaiman, A. R., & Burud, I. A. S., (2022). Metacognitive Awareness and its Relation to Students’ Academic Achievement: Time to Ponder its Implication in Delivery of the Curriculum. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1266966/v1
  85. Heinbach, D. (2022). Rationality. DOCA. https://doi.org/10.34778/5t
  86. Heinonen, K., & Gruen, T. (2024). Elevating Conceptual Research: Insights, Approaches, and Support. AMS Review, 14(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-024-00283-9
  87. Haynes, M., Brown, A., Nichols, K., & Musofer, R. P. (2023). Measurement of Student Attitudes to Science and Association with Inquiry-based Learning in Regional Schools. International Journal of Science Education, 45(8), 593–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2168138
  88. Hidayat, S., Muhali, M., & Zubaidah, R., (2019). The Effect of The Inquiry Learning Model on Students’ Metacognition Awareness. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 7(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v7i2.2049
  89. Hogan, E. A. (2024). Using Inquiry-Based Learning to Improve Student’s Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills in Science . SUNY Brockport, Department of Education and Human Development. Retrieved from https://soar.suny.edu/handle/20.500.12648/14089
  90. Holden, T. G., & Yore, L. D. (1996). Relationships among Prior Conceptual Knowledge, Metacognitive Awareness, Metacognitive Self-Management, Cognitive Style, Perception-Judgment Style, Attitude toward School Science, Self-Regulation, and Science Achievement in Grade 6-7 Students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED395823.pdf
  91. Hong, J. C., Lin, S. S., & Hwang, M. Y., (2021). Critical Attitude and Ability Associated with Students’ Self-Confidence and Attitude toward “Predict-Observe-Explain” Online Science Inquiry Learning. Computers & Education, 164, 104172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104172
  92. Howell, C. R., Su, W., Nassel, A. F., Agne, A. A., & Cherrington, A. L., (2020). Area-Based Stratified Random Sampling using Geospatial Technology in a Community-Based Survey. BMC Public Health, 20, 1678. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09455-2
  93. Hunaepi, H., Suma, I. K., & Subagia, I. W., (2024). Curiosity in Science Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 3(1), 77-105. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v3i1.1918
  94. Hwang, G. H., Chen, B., Chen, R. S., Wu, T. T., & Lai, Y. L., (2019). Differences between Students’ Learning Behaviors and Performances of Adopting A Competitive Game-Based Item Bank Practice Approach for Learning Procedural and Declarative Knowledge. Interactive Learning Environments, 27, 740-753. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1610458
  95. Ibragimova, E. A., Zhumagulova, M. Sh., & Khegay, N. R., (2024). The Role of Critical Thinking in Forming Students’ Research competence. Pedagogics, 73(2). https://doi.org/10.48371/peds.2024.73.2.015
  96. Ignatova, N., Pranckuniene, E., Strazdiene, N., & Smitiene, G., (2024). Inquiry-based Learning Projects Design for STEAM Education Addressing Sustainability Challenges. In Advances in Human Services and Public Health, 285-306. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2987-0.ch015
  97. Inayah, N., & Lubab, A. (2023). Enhancing Analytical Thinking Skills and Scientific Attitudes of Prospective Science Teacher Students through Pre-Practicum Virtual Simulation. EDUSAINS. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v15i2.35431
  98. Ince, M. (2023). Examining The Role of Motivation, Attitude, and Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Shaping Secondary School Students’ Academic Achievement in Science Course. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511612
  99. Indrawatiningsih, N., Purwanto, A. R. As’ari, D., Sudirman, & Rahardi, R., (2019). The Ability of High School Students’ Critical Thinking in Solving Trigonometric Problems. Earth and Environmental Science, 243(1), 12-50. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012050
  100. Irfan, M., Khan, S. Z., Hassan, N., Hassan, M., Habib, M., Khan, S., & Khan, H. H., (2021). Role of Project Planning and Project Manager Competencies on Public Sector Project Success. Sustainability, 13(3), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031421
  101. Islamiah, I., Ade, T., & Mustika, I. (2019). Efforts to Improve the Writing Ability of Text Reports of Observation Results of Students Class.  2(1):22-28. doi: 10.22460/JLER.V2I1.P22-28
  102. Ita, A. J., & Khoiro, U. (2022). Metacognitive Awareness of Students in Animal System Lectures with Portfolio-Based Assignments and Learning Journals. Bioscientist. 10(2), 1209-1209. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v10i2.6719
  103. Ivanova, D. D., & Zhelyazka, R. (2023). Inquiry-Based Learning Approach in Teaching “Phase Transitions” for Experimental Skills Formation in Nearly 16 Years Old Students. https://doi.org/10.22323/1.427.0256
  104. Iyer, L. (2019). Critical Thinking and its Importance In Education. Cognitive, Psychological and Behavioural Perspectives in Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339433132_Critical_Thinking_and_it's_Importance_in_Education
  105. Jagat, L. S., Maulidah, E., Abdillah, F., Sauri, A. S., & Qiptiyah, T. M., (2024). Improving Students’ Abilities by Developing an Inquiry Learning Model. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(1), 275-281. https://doi.org/10.61132/jmpai.v2i1.482
  106. Jaleel, S., & Premachandran, P. (2016). A Study on the Metacognitive Awareness of Secondary School Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040121
  107. Jamil, M., & Bibi, T. (2024). Critical Thinking Skills Development among Secondary School Students: An Analysis of Chemistry Textbook Grade X. Research Journal for Societal Issues, 16(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i2.202
  108. Jamir, T. (2023). Integration Of Skills In Higher Education: Its Relevance. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.8860
  109. Jesús, P., & Azevedo, J. (2024). Student Participation: Auspices and Contradictions on an Educational Innovation Context. Participatory Educational Research, 11(5), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.64.11.5
  110. Jia, T., Wang, C., & Sun, L., (2023). Research on Visual Teaching Strategy of Chemical Declarative Knowledge in Middle School. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(6), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.106.14838
  111. Jirout, J. (2020). Supporting Early Scientific Thinking through Curiosity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1717. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.01717
  112. Johnson, E. S., Reddy, L. A., & Jones, N. D., (2020). Introduction to the Special Series: Can Direct Observation Systems Lead to Improvements in Teacher Practice and Student Outcomes?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(1), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420944795
  113. Jones, M. G., Chesnutt, K., Ennes, M., Macher, D., & Paechter, M., (2022). Measuring Science Capital, Science Attitudes, and Science Experiences in Elementary and Middle School Students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74, 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101180
  114. Justina Lantajo. (2022). An Assessment of Science-Related Attitudes among Freshmen Students in a Philippine University. International Journal of Social Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends, 14(1), 134–143. Retrieved from https://ijsscfrtjournal.isrra.org/index.php/Social_Science_Journal/article/view/1067
  115. Kaçar, T., Terzi, R., Arıkan, İ., & Kırıkçı, A. C. (2021). The Effect of Inquiry-Based Learning on Academic Success: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(2), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.7575/AIAC.IJELS.V.9N.2P.15
  116. Kakalejcik, L., & Pal’ova, D. (2019). Enhancement of Students’ Skills Via Project-Based Learning. Proceedings of the 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 661-666. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2019.8756958
  117. Kamal, P., & Soleha, M. (2023). Ability to Write Scientific Work for Class XI Students of SMA Negeri 4 Sidenreng Rappang Based on Direct Observation. Edumaspul : Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2). doi: 10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.7002
  118. Kane, M. T. (2020). Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12218
  119. Kaur, N. (2020). Metacognitive Awareness in Lexical Learning among Malaysian Students. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 9(3), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.18488/JOURNAL.23.2020.93.161.171
  120. Khan, M., & Siddiqui, M. A. (2020). Examining Scientific Attitude Scales in India: Development and Validation of a New Scale. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental Science Education, 16(4), e2223. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8557 Knowledge, skills, and attitude of Science, Technology, and Society students across programs. 
  121. Klofutar, Š., Jerman, J., and Torkar. (2020). Direct Versus Vicarious Experiences for Developing Children’s Skills of Observation in Early Science Education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 1-18. doi: 10.1080/09669760.2020.1814214
  122. Kobylarek, A., Błaszczyński, K., Ślósarz, L., & Madej, M., (2024). Critical Thinking Questionnaire Construction and Application of Critical Thinking Test Tool. Journal of Educational Research, 22(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1234/jeduresearch.2024.12345
  123. Kori, K. (2020). Inquiry-Based Learning in Higher Education. In Handbook of Research on Advancing Teaching and Learning Through Educational Technology. 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2082-9_4
  124. Kotsis, K. T. (2024). The Significance of Experiments in Inquiry-based Science Teaching. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.2.815
  125. Kovalchuk, I., et al., (2023). Peculiarities of Metacognitive Processes in Students’ Learning Activity. Scientific Notes of the National University “Ostroh Academy”, 1(17(85)), 193-195. https://doi.org/10.25264/2519-2558-2023-17(85)-193-195
  126. Kruse, J. W., et al., (2022). Learning to Learn: Drawing Students’ Attention to Ideas About Learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 95(7), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2022.2033670
  127. Küçükaydın, M. A. (2021). Examination of Elementary School Students’ Scientific Attitudes and Intellectual Risk-Taking Behaviors. Science Education International, 32(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i2.8
  128. Kunovich, R. M. (2022). Confidence in Science: Perceptions of Harmful Consequences, Scientific Uncertainty, and the Pursuit Of Self-Interest in Scientific Research. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221093162
  129. Kusuma, A. K., et al., (2021). The Relationship Between Students’ Problem Solving Skills and Scientific Attitude with Students’ Learning Outcomes on Stoichiometry at Tenth Grade at High School in Boyolali, Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1842, 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012027
  130. Lawrence, F. P., (2023). Correlational Research. Research Methodology Group, UOPX ResearchCommunity.Retrievedfrom https://www.phoenix.edu/content/dam/edu/research/doc/2023/correlational-research.pdf
  131. Le, T. L. (2024). The Role of Critical Thinking in Secondary Education. Journal of Science, 53(2), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.56824/vujs.2024.htkhgd208
  132. Leasa, M. (2024). Contribution Of Metacognition Awareness To Critical Thinking Skills With PBL Model And HPC Strategy: A Food Digestion System Study. Biosfera: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 29(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.29921
  133. Leekhot, K., Payougkiattikun, W., & Thongsuk, T., (2024). The Results of Inquiry-Based Learning Management on Critical Thinking and Academic Achievement of Grade-8 Students. Integrated Science Education Journal, 5(3), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v5i3.901
  134. Lestari, F. D., Syahbana, A., & Retta, A. M., (2022). Analysis of Students’ Concept Understanding Ability through E-Modules On Linear Program Materials. MEJ (Mathematics Education Journal), 6(1), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v6i1.19314
  135. Li, N. (2023). Research on the Cultivation of Students’ Independent Learning Ability. Adult and Higher Education, 5, 49-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2023.051906
  136. Li, H., (2021). Confidence Charms: How Superstition Influences Overconfidence Bias in Han and the Qiang Ethnic Minority Chinese. The Journal of Psychology, 155(5):473-488. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2021.1902918
  137. Lower-Hoppe, L. M., Brgoch, S., Chen, Y.-J., & Sutherland, S., (2020). Inquiry-Based Learning in Action: Theory and Practice in Higher Education. In Transformative Pedagogies in Higher Education 34-59. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4360-3.CH003
  138. Lu, K., Pang, F., & Shadiev, R. (2021). Understanding the Mediating Effect of Learning Approach Between Learning Factors and Higher Order Thinking Skills in Collaborative Inquiry-Based Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-021-10025-4
  139. Makarov, Z., & Bohatyrchuk, D. (2021). Scientific Rationality in an Educational Context: Historical and Philosophical Analysis. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-193-0-20
  140. Manishimwe, H., Shivoga, W. A., & Nsengimana, V.,  (2022). Exploring the Impact of Enquiry-Based Instructional Strategies on Students’ Attitudes towards Biology. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(12), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.12.2
  141. Mao, P., Cai, Z., He, J., Chen, X., & Fan, X., (2021). The Relationship between Attitude toward Science and Academic Achievement in Science: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 (78), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784068
  142. McIntyre, L. (2019). The Scientific Attitude: Defending Science from Denial, Fraud, and Pseudoscience. Retrieved from https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/the-scientific-attitude-defending-science-from-denial-fraud-and-pseudoscience/
  143. Mihardi, S., Derlina, H. S. Shiddiq, & Sinuraya, J., (2022). Scientific Attitudes in Scientific Online Learning Management for Student Successful Characters. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(7), 12-769. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.97.12769
  144. Mikhail, M., & Moresoli, C. (2024). Inquiry-Based Learning: A Student-Centric Approach to Engaging Students in Sustainability and Life Cycle Thinking. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2023.17104
  145. Milzow, K., Reinhardt, A., Soderberg, S., & Zinocker, K., (2019). Understanding the Use and Usability of Research Evaluation Studies. Research Evaluation, 28(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy040
  146. Mirza, H., Bellalem, F., & Mirza, C., (2023). Ethical Considerations In Qualitative Research: Summary Guidelines For Novice Social Science Researchers. Social Studies and Research Journal, 11(1), 441–449.
  147. Miscevic, N. (2019). The Curiosity of Science. In Curiosity and Inquiry, 163-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57103-0_9
  148. Mondal, D. (2023). Metacognitive Awareness and Iis Relation to Academic Performance Among Learners: A Review Paper. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(7), 742–750. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230786
  149. Moravcsik, A. (2019). Transparency in Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036
  150. Morisseau, T., Branch, T. Y., & Origgi, G., (2021). Stakes f Knowing the Truth: A Motivational Perspective on the Popularity of a Controversial Scientific Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 708-751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708751
  151. Msaddek, M., & Boudassamout, H. (2023). The Role of Explicit Metacognitive Strategy Intervention in the Promotion of Declarative, Procedural, and Conditional Knowledge of Reading Heuristics Amongst Moroccan EFL University Students. Journal of Studies in Education, 13(2), 72-72. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v13i2.20984
  152. Muhammad, Q. R., & Inayati, N. (2024). Student Competence in Carrying Out Learning Evaluations in the Era Of Independent Learning. Globalistik, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59996/globalistik.v2i1.435
  153. Murphy, D. H., & Castel, A. D. (2021). Responsible Remembering and Forgetting as Contributors to Memory  for Important Information. Memory & Cognition, 49, 895–911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01067-9
  154. Mutasam, U., Ibrohim, I., & Susilo, H., (2021). The Impact Of Science Learning Based on Inquiry Integrated with Nature of Science towards Communication and Collaboration Skills. Conference Proceedings, 2330(1), 30-64. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043364
  155. Naquila, J. C., & Israel, G. F. G. (2022). Attitudes toward Teaching Science and Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Science Teaching Anxiety among Preservice Teachers. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 3(8), 115. https://uijrt.com/paper/attitudes-toward-teaching-science-self-efficacy-predictors-science-teaching
  156. Nauzeer, S., & Jaunky, V. C. (2021). A Meta-Analysis of the Combined Effects of Motivation, Learning and Personality Traits on Academic Performance. Pedagogical Research, 6(3), 97. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/10963
  157. Nikolaev, D. (2021). Psychological Concept of the Scientific Rationality Types. Ideal Objects and the Types of Rationality. Voprosy Filosofii, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-10-121-131
  158. Nisha, K. & Prema, N. (2022). Level of Scientific Attitude among School Students: A Brief Survey. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 11583–11586. Retrieved from http://journalppw.com
  159. Norman, E., Pfuhl, G., Sæle, R. G., Svartdal, F., Låg, T., & Dahl, T. I., (2019). Metacognition in Psychology. Review of General Psychology, 23(4), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019883821
  160. Nugraha, I., Putri, N. K., & Sholihin, H. (2020). An Analysis of the Relationship Between Students’ Scientific Attitude and Students’ Learning Style in Junior High School. Jurnal Sains dan Lingkungan, 3(3), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.17509/JSL.V3I3.22873
  161. Nunaki, J. H., Damopolii, I., Kandowangko, N. Y., & Nusantari, E., (2019). The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Learning to Train the Students’ Metacognitive Skills Based on Gender Differences. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12232a
  162. Nurjanah, Dahlan, J. A., & Wibisono, Y. (2019). Development of Media Model Based on Hands-On Activity to Improve Conceptual Understanding Abilities of Junior High School Students in Bandung District. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280, 042001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042001
  163. Olschewski, P., Herzmann, P., & Schlüter, K. (2023). Group Work during Inquiry-Based Learning in Biology Teacher Education: A Praxeological Perspective On The Task Of (Collaborative) Protocol Generation. Education Sciences, 13(4), 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040401
  164. Pambudi, G. D., Yuliati, L., & Mufti, N., (2022). Encouraging Students’ Metacognitive Skills through Inquiry Learning. Inornatus, 2(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v2i1.272
  165. Pasaribu, P. A., Indrawan, R., & Fauzi, A., (2023). Scientific Attitude and Critical Thinking. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Islamic Education and Science, 2(1), 596. https://doi.org/10.18326/aicoies.v2i1.596
  166. Patankar, S. P., Mandal, S., & Chakraborty, S., (2022). Curiosity as Filling, Compressing, and Reconfiguring Knowledge Networks. Retrieved from https://typeset.io/pdf/curiosity-as-filling-compressing-and-reconfiguring-knowledge-2ka7q432.pdf
  167. Patra, J. P., Dash, D., & Behera, S., (2022). A Novel Approach to Enhance the Employability Skills of Higher Education Students through Teaching Learning Techniques and Tools. In Teaching and Learning Techniques and Tools, 122-134. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4210-4.ch007
  168. Payumo, J., Arcanjo, M., Garcia, J., & Mendoza, C., (2021). Mapping Collaborations and Partnerships in SDG Research. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 5, 612442. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.612442
  169. Perdana, D., Saragih, S., & Siagian, P. (2022). The Effects of Inquiry Project-Based Learning on the Increasing Student’s Science Literacy Skills and Creative Thinking Skills. Nucleation and Atmospheric Aerosols. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0131311
  170. Pereles, A., Roldan, A., & Martinez, J. (2024). The Power of Metacognitive Strategies to Enhance Critical Thinking in Online Learning. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(3), 831-843. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2721
  171. Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive Development in Children: Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
  172. Pimentel, D. R. (2024). Learning to Evaluate Sources of Science Misnformation on the Internet: Assessing Students’ Scientific Online Reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21974
  173. Popper, K. (1935). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Springer.Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1935-02071-000
  174. Pramesti, F. D., Firdaus, I., & Ningrum, M. A. (2023). The Analysis of Metacognitive Awareness of the Students’ Writing Competence. Language and Education Journal, 8(2), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.52237/lej.v8i2.485
  175. Pratt, B., Wild, V., Barasa, E., Kamuya, D., Gilson, L., Hendl, T., & Molyneux, S. (2020). Justice: A Key Consideration in Health Policy and Systems Research Ethics. BMJ Global Health, 5, e001942. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001942
  176. Probine, S., Perry, J., Alderson, J. M., Heta-Lensen, Y., Burke, R., & McAlevey, F. (2024). Inquiry-Based Project Learning as an Approach to Foster Wellbeing, Sustained Focus, and Bi-Cultural Practice in Early Childhood Education. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 49(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391231212685
  177. Puadah, P. F., Mahmudi, A., & Wahyuningrum, E. (2022). Metacognitive Ability of Junior High School Special Intelligent Students in Solving Mathematical Problems. The Journal of Analysis, 8(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v8i1.15934
  178. Pursitasari, I. D., Mulyani, S., & Lestari, W. (2023). Critical Thinking Skills and Student Scientific Attitudes in IPA Learning During The Covid-19 Pandemic. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2751, 100006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0143301
  179. Putra, E., Sujana, A., & Anggraeni, D. (2021). How Can Scientific Approach Enhancing Student’s Curiosity and Learning Outcomes in Science Learning?. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Research and Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. 138-144. https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210326.019
  180. Qablan, A., Al-Momani, I., Al-Momani, M., & Al-Shara, I. (2024). Inquiry-Based Learning. In Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design Book, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0880-6.ch001
  181. Ragland, E., & Karcher, E. (2023). The Implementation of Inquiry-Based Learning Activities in an Introductory Animal Science Course. NACTA Journal, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v66i1.66
  182. Rahmadiani, R., Lestari, N. A., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2024). Concept Understanding Students on the Two-Variables Linear Equation System Material in Terms of Mathematics Ability. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v12i1.10532
  183. Rahmi, Y. L., Abdullah, A. G., & Sujana, A. (2019). Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through Inquiry-Based Learning Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, 012193. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012193
  184. Rannastu-Avalos, M., Maeots, M., & Siiman, L. A. (2023). Developing Collaborative Problem-Solving Skills through Inquiry-Based Learning. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 11(2), 196-222. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2023.11.2.08
  185. Rebucas, E., & Dales, Z. (2022). A Structural Equation Model on Students’ Performance in Science Of Grade 9 Learners In Davao De Oro Division. International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies, 8(5), 116. https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrms/v8i5.116
  186. Reed, D. E., Kaplita, E. C., McKenzie, D. A., & Jones, R. A. (2022). Student Experiences and Changing Science Interest When Transitioning from K-12 to College. Education Sciences, 12(7), 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070496
  187. Reese, S. (2022). Writing the Conceptual Article: A Practical Guide. Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2009353
  188. Reinhardt, J. (2019). Gameful Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Learning: Theory, Research, And Practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04729-0
  189. Rinaldi, R. (2022). Metacognitive Awareness in Students. Jurnal Neo Konseling, 4(4), 15-15. https://doi.org/10.24036/00692kons2022
  190. Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022) Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Frontier Psychology 13, 913219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219
  191. Rizki, M. I., Lingga, H. N., Intannia, D., Rahmatullah, S. W., Putra, A. M. P., & Silviana, M. (2024). The Effect  of Inquiry-Based Learning on Pharmacist Students. Vidya Karya, 39(1), 1-1. https://doi.org/10.20527/jvk.v39i1.18399
  192. Rodriguez Duque, S., Tal, E., & Barbic, S. P. (2024). The Role of Ethical and Social Values in Psychosocial Measurement. Measurement, 113, 113993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113993
  193. Romanov, P. A. (2021). Rationality as Meta-Thinking. Bulletin of Vyatka State University, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.25730/vsu.7606.21.031
  194. Rumanová, L., Vallo, D., & Laššová, K. (2020). Students’ Ability to Solve Geometry Problems with Emphasis on Interdisciplinary Relations. TEM Journal, 1755-1759. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM94-57
  195. Safitri, M., Suryani, N., Asrowi, &, & Sukarmin. (2024). Validity Of Metacognitive Awareness Inventory as a Measuring Tool for Metacognitive Ability in Mathematics Problem Solving. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2246
  196. Şahintepe, S., Erkol, M., & Aydoğdu, B. (2020). The Impact of Inquiry-Based Learning Approach on Secondary School Students’ Science Process Skills. Open Journal for Educational Research, 4(2), 117-142. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0402.04117s
  197. Saks, K., Ilves, H., & Noppel, A. (2021). The Impact of Procedural Knowledge on the Formation of Declarative Knowledge: How Accomplishing Activities Designed for Developing Learning Skills Impacts Teachers’ Knowledge of Learning Skills. Education Sciences, 11(10), 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100598
  198. Sam, R. (2024). Systematic Review of Inquiry-Based Learning: Assessing Impact and Best Practices In Education. Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155367.1
  199. Samuel, G. (2023). Increasing Student Engagement in Remote Learning Using Self-Assessment. In Innovative Approaches to Online Education, 47-70. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5503-6.ch003
  200. Sandika, B., & Fitrihidajati, H. (2018). Improving Creative Thinking Skills and Scientific Attitude through Inquiry-Based Learning in Basic Biology Lecture Toward Students Of Biology Education. JPBI, 4(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5326
  201. Sarıoglan, A. B. (2021). Development of Inquiry-Based Learning Environment Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(4). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1315800.pdf
  202. Schacter, D. L., & Slotnick, S. D. (2021). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory: An Overview. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(3), 400-410. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01703
  203. Schmidt, S. (2024). Responsibility for Rationality: Foundations Of An Ethics Of Mind. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003382973
  204. Seden, K., Thomas, D. A., & Rinchen, S. (2023). Effects of Self-Assessment on Students’ Evaluative Skills: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Study at Samtse College of Education. Assessment Matters. https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0064
  205. Sekaringtyas, T., Suryono, S., & Hadi, W. (2024). The Influence of Understanding Science Concepts, Critical Thinking Skills, and Scientific Literacy on Scientific Attitudes Class IV Primary School Students. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5228
  206. Senisum, M., & Edu, A. L. (2023). Enhancing Observation and Questioning Skills in Rural Science Education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11855–11861. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5796
  207. Shanderi, I., & Suwardi, S. (2023). Scientific Attitudes in Chemistry Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 15(2). DOI 10.24114/jpkim.v15i2.48881.
  208. Shenton, A. K. (2024). Training School Students in Information Evaluation. Journal of Information Literacy, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.11645/18.1.49
  209. Shintawati, A., Atmojo, I. R. W., & Ardiansyah, R. (2023). The Influence of Metacognitive Awareness on the Critical Thinking Ability of PGSD UNS Surakarta Students. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v11i3.76819
  210. Shofiah, N., Putera, Z. F., & Widiastuti, S. (2024). Collaborative Writing Learning in Inquiry to Improve Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.18860/jeasp.v7i1.26429
  211. Sidelil, A., & Feza, N. (2019). Assessment of Students’ Conceptual Knowledge in Limit of Functions. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.29333/IEJME/6294
  212. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding Descriptive Research Designs and Methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
  213. Simbolon, M. E., Ramli, M., & Handayani, S. (2021). How Scientific Attitude Like Scientists Have? A Content Analysis of The Narrative Book that Represents Stephen Hawking’s Journey Of Life. https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.12-12-2020.2305016
  214. Şimşek, P., & Kabapınar, F. (2010). The Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Elementary Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Matter, Scientific Process Skills, And Science Attitudes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1701–1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.170
  215. Siswi, N. R. T., Hidayat, T., & Wulandari, R. (2023). Innovation for Measuring Students’ Metacognitive Abilities through Project-Based Learning. Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 10(1), 71-71. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v10i12023p071
  216. Smith, J. A., & Johnson, L. M. (2020). Problem-Focused Coping and Academic Stress: A Systematic Review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000398
  217. Snow, N. (2022). The Value of Open-Mindedness and Intellectual Humility for Interdisciplinary Research. Scientia et Fides, 10(2), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.12775/setf.2022.018
  218. Smith, A. J. H. (2024). Ethical Considerations in Practitioner Research. Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development Book Series, 29–56. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1499-9.ch002
  219. Southworth, J. (2021). A Perspective-Taking Theory of Open-Mindedness: Confronting the Challenge of Motivated Reasoning. Educational Theory, 71(6), 715-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12497
  220. Stambouli, O. A., Pegka, S. S., Gerothanassis, I. P., & Tsaparlis, G. (2023). Undergraduate Chemistry Students’ Perceived Abilities and Declarative Knowledge on Some Basic Aspects and Concepts of Spectroscopy. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(36). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00720
  221. Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering Metacognition to Support Student Learning and Performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289
  222. Stofer, K. A., Hanson, D., & Hecht, K. (2022). Scientists Need Professional Development to Practice Meaningful Public Engagement. Journal of Science Communication, 21(4), Article 2127672. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2127672
  223. Suastra, I. W., & Ristiati, N. P. (2019). Developing Critical Thinking, Scientific Attitude, and Self-EfficacyiIn Students through Project-Based Learning and Authentic Assessment in Science Teaching at Junior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233, 012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012087
  224. Suharto, S., Widada, W., Susanta, A., & Haji, S. (2020). The Ability to Understand Concepts: Cognitive Style, Cognitive Structure, Learning Styles and Learning Motivation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.33369/PENDIPA.5.1.15-22
  225. Sulistyaningrum, I. S., Hartanto, R., & Permanasari, A. E. (2020). Students’ Self-Monitoring Skill Classification in Learning Activities. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education, 66-69. https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.200521.014
  226. Sun, D., & Li, Y. (2019). Effectiveness Of Digital Note-Taking on Students’ Performance in Declarative, Procedural and Conditional Knowledge Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(18), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V14I18.10825
  227. Sun, Z. (2021). Psychological Concept tf The Scientific Rationality Types: Development of Scientific Knowledge. Voprosy Filosofii, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-11-34-44
  228. Sutirna, S., & Safuri, M. (2023). The Importance of Understanding Ability, Skills and Attitudes ff Students in the Practice of Guidance and Counseling Services. Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy. https://doi.org/10.51214/00202305611000
  229. Suyatman, S., Saputro, S., Sunarno, W., & Sukarmin, S. (2021). Profile Of Student Analytical Thinking Skills In The Natural Sciences By Implementing Problem-Based Learning Model. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 89-111. https://doi.org/10.7358/ECPS-2021-023-SUYA
  230. Syarifuddin, S. (2023). The Effect of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’ Mastery of Concept and Social Skills. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(2), 434-434. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i2.13236
  231. Tak, C. C., Zulnaidi, H., & Eu, L. K. (2022). Measurement Model Testing: Adaption of Metacognitive Awareness toward Mathematic Reasoning among Undergraduate Education Students. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(2), ep22021. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12510
  232. Talampas, M. (2023). Into The Lens of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL): Student’s Engagement, Motivation, and Attitudes among Grade 10 Students Of An Integrated High School. https://doi.org/10.69651/pijhss030323
  233. Taramopoulos, A., & Psillos, D. (2022). Developing Procedural Knowledge in Secondary Education Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2297(1), 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2297/1/012010
  234. Telaumbanua, Y. N., Syahputra, E., & Surya, E. (2024). Students’ Metacognitive Awareness in Mathematics Learning. Academy of Education Journal: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Kependidikan. https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v15i1.2359
  235. Tarwiyani, T., & Mahanal, S. (2020). The Influence of Science Learning Based on Inquiry Integrated with Nature of Science (NOS) towards Students’ Attitudes and Interests in Science. 2215, 030020. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000633
  236. Tjabolo, S. A., Maliki, P. L., & Lasido Irfani, I. (2022). Metacognitive Awareness of Madrasah Tsanawiyah Students in Gorontalo City in the Implementation of Online Learning. E-journal, 18(2), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.30603/ir.v18i2.3068
  237. Toleva-Stoimenova, S., & Rasheva-Yordanova, K. (2023). Developing Analytical Thinking Skills in Higher Education. Obrazovanie i Tehnologii, 14(1), 86-90. https://doi.org/10.26883/2010.231.4977
  238. Tommasi, M., Petricca, P., Cozzolino, G., & Casadio, C. (2021). Attitudes towards Scientific Knowledge: Social Dispositions and Personality Traits. Synthese, 199(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11229-020-02632-0
  239. Tomory, I. (2023). Student Centered Methods, Soft Skills and Competency Based Learning from the View Of Engineering and Technical Teacher Students. Proceedings of CELDA 2023. https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2023_202306l015
  240. Trinchero, R. (2020). The Role of Self-assessment of Learning in University Education: Ideas from field research. Formazione: Open Journal for Online Education, 20(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.13128/FORM-8245
  241. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020). Measuring Global Education Goals: How TIMSS Helps – Monitoring Progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 4 Using Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Retrieved from https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2020-12/EN_IEA%20UNESCO%20Joint-report_TIMSS%202019-final.pdf
  242. Urdanivia Alarcon, D. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Rucano Paucar, F. H., Cayani Caceres, K. S., & Machaca Viza, R. (2023). Science and Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1170487. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487
  243. Uwayezu, D., Ntigura, E., Gatarayiha, A., Erem, A. S., Haque, M., Majumder, M. A. A., & Razzaque, M. S. (2022). Conflict between Science and Superstition in Medical Practices. International Medical Education, 1(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.3390/ime1020007
  244. Valenzuela, S., & Bachmann, I. (2017). Path Analysis. In the International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0181
  245. Van der Waldt, G. (2020). Constructing Conceptual Frameworks in Social Science Research. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 16(1), 758. https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v16i1.758
  246. Van der Zalm, A. J., Barroso, J., Browne, P., Casey, W., Gordon, J., Henry, T. R., Kleinstreuer, N. C., Lowit, A. B., Perron, M., & Clippinger, A. J. (2022). A Framework for Establishing Scientific Confidence in New Approach Methodologies. Archives of Toxicology, 96, 2865-2880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03365-4
  247. Van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2020). Digital Inequality During a Pandemic: Quantitative Study of Differences in COVID-19–Related Internet Uses and Outcomes among the General Population. JMIR Publications, 22(8). https://doi.org/10.2196/20073
  248. Velmurugan, P. (2019). A Study on Scientific Attitude of Elementary Teacher Education Students. Psychology and Behavioral Science International Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.19080/PBSIJ.2019.11.555805
  249. Vendrell-Morancho, M., Rodríguez-Mantilla, J. M., & Fernández-Díaz, M. J. (2024). (2024). Predictors of Critical Thinking in Spanish University Students. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 22(3), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2024.22.3.002
  250. Verawati, N. N. S. P., Harjono, A., & Prayogi, S. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Disposition in Science Learning. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi), 10(1), 200-210. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v10i1.7127
  251. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. London: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://home.fau.edu/musgrove/web/vygotsky1978.pdf
  252. Wale, B., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of Using Inquiry-Based Learning on EFL Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2
  253. Wang, H. S., Chen, S., & Yen, M. H. (2021). Effects of Metacognitive Scaffolding on Students’ Performance and Confidence Judgments in Simulation-Based Inquiry. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 020108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVPHYSEDUCRES.17.020108
  254. Wang, N. (2024). Exploring Big Ideas-Based Holistic Unit Teaching Design from the Perspective of Ausubel’s Subsumption Theory. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 9(2), 306. https://drpress.org/ojs/index.php/jeer/article/view/23308/22856
  255. Wang, N., Xu, Q., Li, G., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Cultivate Students’ Innovation Ability Based on the Follow-Up Study of Contest Problems. International Conference on Big Data and Information Engineering, 030064. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDIE50010.2020.00052
  256. Wanzer, D. L. (2020). What is Evaluation?: Perspectives of How Evaluation Differs from Research. Communication Education, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020920710
  257. Wardani, M., Feronika, T., & Ardianti, D. L. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Conventional Learning. Lavoisier, 3(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.24952/lavoisier.v3i1.11598
  258. White, M. G. (2020). Why Human Subjects Research Protection is Important. Ochsner Journal, 20(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.5012
  259. Widinda, N. A. (2020). Analysis of Students’ Understanding Ability in Scientific Writing Technique Course. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2229(1), 020013. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0002912
  260. Winthrop, R., Ziegler, L., Handa, R., & Fakoya, F. (2019). How Playful Learning Can Help Leapfrog Progress in Education. Center for Universal Education at Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2019/04/how_playful_learning_can_help_leapfrog_progress_in_education.pdf
  261. Wirzal, M. D. H., Halim, N. S. A., Nordin, N. A. H. M., & Bustam, M. A. (2022). Metacognition in Science Learning: Bibliometric Analysis of Last Two Decades. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, 6(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i1.665
  262. Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2021). Student Engagement: Current State of the Construct, Conceptual Refinement, and Future Research Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 43(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
  263. Woolley, J. D., Baca, P. A., & Kelley, K. A. (2023). Development of a Naïve Theory Of Superstition. Journal of Cognition and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2256871
  264. World Bank. (2022). Learning Poverty Report. Conference Edition,7. Retrieved from https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/e52f55322528903b27f1b7e61238e416-0200022022/original/Learning-poverty-report-2022-06-21-final-V7-0-conferenceEdition.pdf
  265. Wulandari, H. Y. A., Ekawati, R., & Shodikin, A. (2024). Exploring Creative Thinking Skill. Jupitek, 7(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol7iss1pp22-32
  266. Wynn, G. (2024). Reformative Concept Analysis for Applied Psychology Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 21(3), 251–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2346851
  267. Wynn, G. (2024). Reformative Concept Analysis for Applied Psychology Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 21(3), 251–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2346851
  268. Xiong, X., & Noichun, D. (2022). Talking About How to Improve Learners’ Self-Monitoring Ability with Practice. Language Education, 10(5), 159-159. https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v10i5.2717
  269. Yammine, E., & Rammal, A. (2021). Path Analysis o Assess Socio-Economic and Mitigation Measure Determinants for Daily Coronavirus Infections. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10071. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910071
  270. Yau, S. A., Majid, F. A., Sharil, W. N. E. H., Halim, N. D. A., Zaid, N. M., & Mokhtar, M. (2023). The Perceived Impact of Critical Thinking on Student’s Learning Performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), 974 – 991. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/17220
  271. Yeoh, C. P., Li, C. T., & Hou, H. T. (2024). Game-Based Collaborative Scientific Inquiry Learning Using Realistic Context and Inquiry Process-Based Multidimensional Scaffolding. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2354944
  272. Yu, S., Jantharajit, N., & Srikhao, S. (2024). Collaborative Inquiry-Based Instructional Model to Enhance Mathematical Analytical Thinking and Reasoning Skills for Fourth-Grade Students. Asian Journal of Education and Training. https://doi.org/10.20448/edu.v10i1.5323
  273. Zaidi, F. Z., & Zaidi, A. R. Z. (2022). Strategies for Improving Memory in Students. Journal of Student Health and Medical Development, 3(2), 197-200. https://doi.org/10.53685/jshmdc.v3i2.130
  274. Zulnaidi, H., Tak, C. C., & Eu, L. K.  (2022). Measurement Model Testing: Adaption of Self-Efficacy and Metacognitive Awareness among University Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(9), em2153-em2153. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12366.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic